Airplane Noise Pollution

For those living under the flight path of the busiestto respect for private and family life and home.
airport in the world a good night's sleep has becomeHowever, it did find that under Article 13 of the HRC,
a distant dream. A sleep- deprived Tessa Swithinbankthe residents hadn't been given the opportunity to
explains why Heathrow is a Human Rights issue.make their case fully in the UK courts. So the fight
The sun is out and the birds are chattering. It iswill go on.
blissfully quiet and I am deep in slumber. A deepNoise is one of the worst pollutants and can ruin your
droning noise jerks me awake. No, it is not myquality of life. Friends of the Earth remind us that
Sunday afternoon nap under the pear tree. It is 4.30night flights have caused many residents to suffer
a.m. on a summer's morning and the first long haulfrom constant tiredness, clinical depression, irritability,
flight of the day is about to land at Heathrow. I haveheadaches and ear infections caused by wearing
to get up in two and a half hours to travel to workearplugs. It maintains that the noise caused by the
on a hot, sweaty tube train. Too late, though, to getnight flights was substantially in excess of the World
back to dreamland. That jumbo has broken my sleepHealth Organisation's guidelines for avoiding sleep
for good.disturbance at night. If you have troublesome noisy
Welcome to life under the flight path of the busiestneighbours, you are protected by the Noise Act of
airport in the world.1996. But, guess what, it doesn't apply to aircraft
In Isleworth, we can just about get used to thenoise! According to the UK Noise Association, aviation
aeroplanes coming in every two minutes during theis virtually above the law.
day because landings are rotated so that aircraftHACAN Clearskies (Heathrow Association for the
don't fly constantly over the same houses. But nightControl of Aircraft Noise) is the largest voluntary
flights? I don't think so.organisation in Europe dedicated to campaigning on
Sixteen night flights have been allowed at Heathrowbehalf of those who suffer because of aircraft flight
between 11.30 pm and 6am since 1993. Most of thepaths. Whilst not opposed to Heathrow per se, the
flights arrive after 4.30 am. The government isorganisation has fought various battles over the
looking into the possibility of more night flights,years. It played an important part, for example, in
provided aircraft use quieter engines as the older andpersuading the Government to introduce runway
bigger aircraft make a horrendous noise.alternation, so that residents in South West London
So you can imagine how dismayed both myself, andwere not continuously bombarded with noise.
the other 600,000 people living under Heathrow'sThere is also the ongoing issue of whether there will
flight paths, were to hear that the government hadbe a third runway at Heathrow. Heathrow's proximity
won its appeal against the European Court of Humanto London means aircraft continuously circle over the
Rights' ruling that night flights should be bannedcapital and come in to land over crowded urban
because we are entitled to a good night's sleep. Inareas. (If the 2001 Concorde crash had happened in
fact it was the European Court of Human RightsLondon, and not in Paris, the plane would have come
which overturned its previous decision in 2001 thatdown on Ealing!)
"there was no overwhelming national interest forHACAN believes that a third runway would increase
night flights at Heathrow, and therefore the residents'the possibility of a mid air collision over London. It
basic human right to sleep should not be sacrificedwould also mean 500 more flights a day and a plane
for the convenience of airlines".flying over our houses every minute, not to mention
So why a change of heart by the court? Economics.bad air pollution, congested roads and public
According to our local paper, the Richmond andtransport, and disruption of childrens schooling.
Twickenham Times, the court found that theSo lets keep battling for a decent nights sleep. We
economic benefits to the country as a wholemay have lost this round of the battle, but it will
outweighed the interests of sleepless residents. Thecontinue now in the UK courts.
court said that there had been no violation of ArticleLooking for ethical companies that dont destory the
8 of the Human Rights Convention (HRC), the rightenvironment?